During a field visit, what should an officer do if they suspect a probationer is under the influence?

When an officer suspects a probationer is under the influence during a field visit, the appropriate course of action is to document observations and follow drug testing policy. This approach is crucial for several reasons.

First, proper documentation of the officer's observations serves as an official record of the incident. This can be important for future reference or legal purposes, as it provides a clear account of the officer's findings and actions.

Second, following established drug testing policy ensures that the officer adheres to the legal and procedural guidelines required in these situations. This policy typically outlines the correct steps to take when drug use is suspected, including how to conduct tests and the circumstances under which they should be administered. By following this policy, the officer is acting within the scope of their duties and protecting the integrity of the probation process.

This method is more effective than ignoring the suspicion, as it addresses the potential risk to public safety while maintaining the officer's professionalism and compliance with procedures. Moreover, while confronting the probationer or calling for backup might seem proactive, these actions could lead to unnecessary escalation or complications if not handled correctly and according to protocol. Hence, documenting the observations and adhering to drug testing policy is the most prudent course of action.